Wednesday, May 18, 2011

Robert Fisk: Why no outcry over these torturing tyrants?, Taibi: The People vs. Goldman Sachs

http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/fisk/robert-fisk-why-no-outcry-over-these-torturing-tyrants-2283907.html

 

Why no outcry over these torturing tyrants?

By Robert Fisk

Independent   Saturday, 14 May 2011

 

Christopher Hill, a former US secretary of state for east Asia who was ambassador to Iraq – and usually a very obedient and un-eloquent American diplomat – wrote the other day that "the notion that a dictator can claim the sovereign right to abuse his people has become unacceptable".


Unless, of course – and Mr Hill did not mention this – you happen to live in Bahrain. On this tiny island, a Sunni monarchy, the al-Khalifas, rule a majority Shia population and have responded to democratic protests with death sentences, mass arrests, the imprisonment of doctors for letting patients die after protests and an "invitation" to Saudi forces to enter the country. They have also destroyed dozens of Shia mosques with all the thoroughness of a 9/11 pilot. But then, let's remember that most of the 9/11 killers were indeed Saudis.

 

And what do we get for it? Silence. Silence in the US media, largely silence in the European press, silence from our own beloved Camer Clegg and of course from the White House. And – shame of shame – silence from the Arabs who know where their bread is buttered. That means, of course, also silence from al-Jazeera. I often appear on their otherwise excellent Arabic and English editions, but their failure to mention Bahrain is shameful, a dollop of shit in the dignity that they have brought to reporting in the Middle East. The Emir of Qatar – I know him and like him very much – does not need to belittle his television empire in this way.

 

CamerClegg is silent, of course, because Bahrain is one of our "friends" in the Gulf, an eager arms buyer, home to thousands of Brit expatriates who – during the mini-revolution by Bahrain's Shia – spent their time writing vicious letters to the local pro-Khalifa press denouncing Western journalists. And as for the demonstrators, I recall a young Shia woman telling me that if only the Crown Prince would come to the Pearl Roundabout and talk with the protesters, they would carry him on their shoulders around the square. I believed her. But he didn't come. Instead, he destroyed their mosques and claimed the protests were an Iranian plot – which was never the case – and destroyed the statue of the pearl at the roundabout, thus deforming the very history of his own country.

 

Obama, needless to say, has his own reasons for silence. Bahrain hosts the US Fifth Fleet and the Americans don't want to be shoved out of their happy little port (albeit that they could up-sticks and move to the UAE or Qatar anytime they wish) and want to defend Bahrain from mythical Iranian aggression. So you won't find La Clinton, so keen to abuse the Assad family, saying anything bad about the al-Khalifas. Why on earth not? Are we all in debt to the Gulf Arabs? They are honourable people and understand when criticism is said with good faith. But no, we are silent. Even when Bahraini students in Britain are deprived of their grants because they protested outside their London embassy, we are silent. CamerClegg, shame on you.

 

Bahrain has never had a reputation as a "friend" of the West, albeit that is how it likes to be portrayed. More than 20 years ago, anyone protesting the royal family's dominance risked being tortured in the security police headquarters. The head of it was a former British police Special Branch officer whose senior torturer was a pernicious major in the Jordanian army. When I published their names, I was rewarded with a cartoon in the government newspaper Al-Khaleej which pictured me as a rabid dog. Rabid dogs, of course, have to be exterminated. It was not a joke. It was a threat.

 

The al-Khalifas have no problems with the opposition newspaper, Al-Wasat, however. They arrested one of its founders, Karim Fakhrawi, on 5 April. He died in police custody a week later. Ten days later, they arrested the paper's columnist, Haidar Mohamed al-Naimi. He has not been seen since. Again, silence from CamerClegg, Obama, La Clinton and the rest. The arrest and charging of Shia Muslim doctors for letting their patients die – the patients having been shot by the "security forces", of course – is even more vile. I was in the hospital when these patients were brought in. The doctors' reaction was horror mixed with fear – they had simply never seen such close-range gunshot wounds before. Now they have been arrested, doctors and patients taken from their hospital beds. If this was happening in Damascus, Homs or Hama or Aleppo, the voices of CamerClegg, and Obama and La Clinton would be ringing in our ears. But no. Silence. Four men have been sentenced to death for killing two Bahraini policemen. It was a closed military court. Their "confessions" were aired on television, Soviet-style. No word from CamerClegg or Obama or La Clinton.

 

What is this nonsense? Well, I will tell you. It has nothing to do with the Bahrainis or the al-Khalifas. It is all about our fear of Saudi Arabia. Which also means it is about oil. It is about our absolute refusal to remember that 9/11 was committed largely by Saudis. It is about our refusal to remember that Saudi Arabia supported the Taliban, that Bin Laden was a Saudi, that the most cruel version of Islam comes from Saudi Arabia, the land of head-choppers and hand-cutters. It is about a conversation I had with a Bahraini official – a good and decent and honest man – in which I asked him why the Bahraini prime minister could not be elected by a majority Shia population. "The Saudis would never permit it," he said. Yes, our other friends. The Saudis. 

 

* * *

 

From: Portside Moderator [mailto: moderator@PORTSIDE.ORG

 

The People vs. Goldman Sachs

 

A Senate committee has laid out the evidence. Now the Justice

Department should bring criminal charges

 

By MATT TAIBBI

Rolling Stone: May 11, 2011 

 

This article appears in the May 26, 2011 issue of Rolling

Stone. The issue is available now on newsstands and will

appear in the online archive May 13.

 

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-people-vs-goldman-sachs-20110511

 

 

They weren't murderers or anything; they had merely stolen

more money than most people can rationally conceive of, from

their own customers, in a few blinks of an eye. But then they

went one step further. They came to Washington, took an oath

before Congress, and lied about it.

 

Thanks to an extraordinary investigative effort by a Senate

subcommittee that unilaterally decided to take up the burden

the criminal justice system has repeatedly refused to

shoulder, we now know exactly what Goldman Sachs executives

like Lloyd Blankfein and Daniel Sparks lied about. We know

exactly how they and other top Goldman executives, including

David Viniar and Thomas Montag, defrauded their clients.

America has been waiting for a case to bring against Wall

Street. Here it is, and the evidence has been gift-wrapped

and left at the doorstep of federal prosecutors, evidence

that doesn't leave much doubt: Goldman Sachs should stand

trial.

 

The great and powerful Oz of Wall Street was not the only

target of Wall Street and the Financial Crisis: Anatomy of a

Financial Collapse, the 650-page report just released by the

Senate Subcommittee on Investigations, chaired by Democrat

Carl Levin of Michigan, alongside Republican Tom Coburn of

Oklahoma. Their unusually scathing bipartisan report also

includes case studies of Washington Mutual and Deutsche Bank,

providing a panoramic portrait of a bubble era that produced

the most destructive crime spree in our history - "a million

fraud cases a year" is how one former regulator puts it. But

the mountain of evidence collected against Goldman by Levin's

small, 15-desk office of investigators - details of gross,

baldfaced fraud delivered up in such quantities as to almost

serve as a kind of sarcastic challenge to the curiously

impassive Justice Department - stands as the most important

symbol of Wall Street's aristocratic impunity and

prosecutorial immunity produced since the crash of 2008.

 

To read more, go to

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-people-vs-goldman-sachs-20110511

 

 

___________________________________________

 

Portside aims to provide material of interest to people

on the left that will help them to interpret the world

and to change it.

 

Submit via email: portside@portside.org

Sub/Unsub: http://portside.org/subscribe-and-unsubscribe

Search Portside archives: http://portside.org/archive

Contribute to Portside: https://portside.org/donate

 

 

-----

No virus found in this message.

Checked by AVG - www.avg.com

Version: 10.0.1375 / Virus Database: 1500/3643 - Release Date: 05/17/11

 

 

 

No comments:

Post a Comment