An American Bribe that Stinks of Appeasement
By Robert Fisk
November 20, 2010 "The Independent" - - In any other country, the current
American bribe to Israel, and the latter's reluctance to accept it, in
return for even a temporary end to the theft of somebody else's property
would be regarded as preposterous. Three billion dollars' worth of fighter
bombers in return for a temporary freeze in West Bank colonisation for a
mere 90 days? Not including East Jerusalem - so goodbye to the last chance
of the east of the holy city for a Palestinian capital - and, if Benjamin
Netanyahu so wishes, a rip-roaring continuation of settlement on Arab land.
In the ordinary sane world in which we think we live, there is only one word
for Barack Obama's offer: appeasement. Usually, our lords and masters use
that word with disdain and disgust.
Anyone who panders to injustice by one people against another people is
called an appeaser. Anyone who prefers peace at any price, let alone a $3bn
bribe to the guilty party - is an appeaser. Anyone who will not risk the
consequences of standing up for international morality against territorial
greed is an appeaser. Those of us who did not want to invade Afghanistan
were condemned as appeasers. Those of us who did not want to invade Iraq
were vilified as appeasers. Yet that is precisely what Obama has done in his
pathetic, unbelievable effort to plead with Netanyahu for just 90 days of
submission to international law. Obama is an appeaser.
The fact that the West and its political and journalistic elites - I include
the ever more disreputable New York Times - take this tomfoolery at face
value, as if it can seriously be regarded as another "step" in the "peace
process", to put this mystical nonsense "back on track", is a measure of the
degree to which we have taken leave of our senses in the Middle East.
It is a sign of just how far America (and, through our failure to condemn
this insanity, Europe) has allowed its fear of Israel - and how far Obama
has allowed his fear of Israeli supporters in Congress and the Senate - to
go.
Three billion dollars for three months is one billion dollars a month to
stop Israel's colonisation. That's half a billion dollars a fortnight.
That's $500m a week. That's $71,428,571 a day, or $2,976,190 an hour, or
$49,603 a minute. And as well as this pot of gold, Washington will continue
to veto any resolutions critical of Israel in the UN and prevent "Palestine"
from declaring itself a state. It's worth invading anyone to get that much
cash to stage a military withdrawal, let alone the gracious gesture of not
building more illegal colonies for only 90 days while furiously continuing
illegal construction in Jerusalem at the same time.
The Hillary Clinton version of this grotesquerie would be funny if it was
not tragic. According to the sharp pen of the NYT's Roger Cohen, La Clinton
has convinced herself that Palestine is "achievable, inevitable and
compatible with Israel's security". And what persuaded Madame Hillary of
this? Why, on a trip to the pseudo-Palestine "capital" of Ramallah last
year, she saw the Jewish settlements - "the brutality of it was so stark"
according to one of her officials - but thought her motorcade was being
guarded by the Israeli army because "they're so professional". And then, lo
and behold, they turned out to be a Palestinian military guard, a
"professional outfit" - and all this changed Madame's views!
Quite apart from the fact that the Israeli army is a rabble, and that
indeed, the Palestinians are a rabble too, this "road to Ramallah" incident
led supporters of Madame, according to Cohen, to realise that there had been
a transition "from a self-pitying, self-dramatising Palestinian psyche, with
all the cloying accoutrements of victimhood, to a self-affirming culture of
pragmatism and institution-building". Palestinian "prime minister" Salam
Fayyad, educated in the US so, naturally, a safe pair of hands, has put
"growth before grumbling, roads before ranting, and security before
everything".
Having been occupied by a brutal army for 43 years, those wretched,
dispossessed Palestinians, along with their cousins in the West Bank who
have been homeless for 62 years, have at last stopped ranting and grumbling
and feeling sorry for themselves and generally play-acting in order to
honour the only thing that matters. Not justice. Certainly not democracy,
but to the one God which Christians, Jews and Muslims are all now supposed
to worship: security.
Yes, they have joined the true brotherhood of mankind. Israel will be safe
at last. That this infantile narrative now drives the woman who told us 11
years ago that Jerusalem was "the eternal and indivisible capital of Israel"
proves that the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has now reached its apogee, its
most treacherous and final moment. And if Netanyahu has any sense - I'm
talking abut the Zionist, expansionist kind - he will wait out the 90 days,
then thumb his nose at the US. In the three months of "good behaviour", of
course, the Palestinians will have to bite the bullet and sit down to
"peace" talks which will decide the future borders of Israel and
"Palestine". But since Israel controls 62 per cent of the West Bank this
leaves Fayyad and his chums about 10.9 per cent of mandate Palestine to
argue about.
And at the cost of $827 a second, they'd better do some quick grovelling.
They will. We should all hang our heads in shame. But we won't. It's not
about people. It's about presentation. It's not about justice. It's about
"security". And cash. Lots of it. Goodbye Palestine.
No comments:
Post a Comment