http://www.commondreams.org/newswire/2011/06/06-2
Hundreds Begin 50 Mile March to Protect Blair Mountain in Southern W.Va.
Marchers call for end to mountaintop removal, protection of Blair Mountain , strengthened labor rights
Hundreds more are expected to join throughout the march. The march will end with a rally in
Blair Mountain March media@blairmountainmarch.org
Common Dreams: June 7, 2011
Chuck Keeney, great grandson of famed UMWA leader during the 1921 Battle of Blair Mountain spoke at the conference. Also speaking were Coal Country producer Mari-Lynn Evans; Salt Rock native Brandon Nida,and Wilma Steele, a Mingo county art teacher. Photos are available upon request at: media@blairmountainmarch.org
“We’re here to build a better future for our kids, for our community,” said Brandon Nida, Salt Rock
Marchers will follow the same route that coal miners took when they marched to
“Mountaintop removal eliminates jobs, not creates jobs,” said retired UMWA miner Joe Stanley, “I’m doing this to preserve the history and culture
Hundreds more are expected to join throughout the march. The march will end with a rally in
Mountaintop removal is an extreme form of coal mining that involves blasting off the tops of mountains in order to extract the seams of coal underneath. Overburden—the industry term for topsoil, trees, and rock containing toxic heavy metals—is dumped in valleys, finding its way into water sources and contaminating the drinking water of those who live nearby. Community members living near mountains permitted for mountaintop removal often choose to vacate their homes rather than endure these adverse conditions, which also include increased flooding and poor air quality.
Email: media@blairmountainmarch.org
Phone: (304) 518-0696 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting (304) 518-0696
* * *
http://www.thenation.com/article/161084/medicare-all
Medicare for All!
“Nearly 80 percent oppose cutting Medicare benefits and two-thirds support raising taxes to continue to fund them. That’s because Medicare works—not perfectly, but compared with private health insurance, it’s far more efficient at keeping down costs while ensuring a baseline of coverage.”
Editors, The Nation: in the June 20, 2011 edition
The day after Democrat Kathy Hochul scored an upset victory in a special election deep in upstate New York’s Republican territory, former President Bill Clinton was getting real chummy with Congressman Paul Ryan, whose plan to privatize Medicare was widely seen as costing the Republicans the race and imperiling as many as a hundred GOP House seats in next year’s Congressional elections. Backstage at an event on national debt at the Peter G. Peterson Foundation, Clinton told Ryan, “I hope the Democrats don’t use it [the election] as an excuse to do nothing” on Medicare.
The Democrats do need a winning Medicare plan, but they’re not going to find it by meeting Republicans in the middle (as
Indeed, the main strategy Democrats seem to have adopted in the wake of Hochul’s victory is to force Republicans to double down on Ryan’s agenda and pray that voters, particularly seniors, remain alarmed enough about the right’s shock doctrine tactics to throw the bums out. That might be a winning electoral formula, but how about some leadership and a plan to deal with rising healthcare costs? Where Democrats should look is Medicare itself—Medicare for all.
The chief lesson Democrats should take from the backlash to Ryan’s Medicare privatization scheme is that when faced with a choice between a market-based healthcare system and a government-run plan, voters overwhelmingly favor the latter. Nearly 80 percent oppose cutting Medicare benefits and two-thirds support raising taxes to continue to fund them. That’s because Medicare works—not perfectly, but compared with private health insurance, it’s far more efficient at keeping down costs while ensuring a baseline of coverage.
Contra Ryan, the problem with Medicare is that it’s not big enough; in countries like France and Canada as well as the United Kingdom, where government plays a much bigger role in financing healthcare and bargaining down prices, healthcare costs are about half what we currently spend, and they have comparable or better health outcomes.
Instead of just hoping that Republicans continue to play to their Tea Party base and implode in a general election, Democrats should be taking this moment to lead and to educate, not just on the practical virtues of Medicare for all but on the principle of social solidarity behind it.
They have the perfect opportunity now that Vermont Governor Peter Shumlin signed a single-payer healthcare plan on May 26.
But in order to act as a national model,
The Editors
No comments:
Post a Comment