Saturday, July 21, 2012

America needs to talk about gun control, Camp Kinderland

 I got up early this morning, anticipating Chris Hayes would focus his Up With program on the
Colorado massacre.  And so he did, with, among others, Dave Cullen, author of "Columbine," the
definitive book on a horrible phenomenon.  Cullen put forth clear, rarely heard propositions which 
made a lot of sense.  "Everything we thought we knew about Colombine or the several other such
travesties is wrong,"  and "There is a ritual of the media, local, state and federal government and
other major American voices proclaiming  these atrocities as aberations, perpetrated by strange,
isolated loners, etcl, etc.  He went through non only Colombine, but several other such, disproving
that thesis, factually.  The perpetrators were not loners, but mostly socialized, respected young men. 
He added to that the mass media massively focussing on the perpetrator and mostlyignoring the victims,
beyond the first few days; the result being two things:  The public remembers these events hazily
and wrongly as above, and there is little public focus on the causes; political or psycho/sociological. 
The show offered a wonderful intro to the wonderful essay by Gary Younge, just below.
I added the second story, Camp Kiderland as a hopeful, actually delightful response to the same
sort of elite, though not so deadly misinformation.  It's a real upper and I think you'll enjoy it. -Ed

America needs to talk about gun control in the wake of the Colorado shooting

Sympathy for Aurora's victims should not stop us addressing the fact that more than 84 people are shot to death daily in the US

Gary Younge

The chorus of empathetic responses to the tragic shootings at the Aurora movie theater, near Denver, Colorado early Friday morning marks a stubborn refrain in a perennial American elegy. Different singers mouthing different words, but basically singing the same song.

Psychological profiles of the shooter emerge, along with portraits of the victims, while the political class closes ranks so that the nation can heal. Incanted tones to sooth a permanent scar.

All rituals serve a purpose. And this one is no different.

At least 12 people have died. Their families must be given space to mourn, and that space should be respected. But it does not honour the dead to insist that there must be no room in that space for rational thought and critical appraisal. Indeed, such situations demand both.

For one can only account for so many "isolated" incidents before it becomes necessary to start dealing with a pattern. It is simply not plausible to understand events in Colorado this Friday without having a conversation about guns in a country where more than 84 people a day are killed with guns, and more than twice that number are injured with them.

Amid all the column inches and airtime devoted to these horrific slayings, though, that elephant in the room will remain affectionately patted, discreetly fed and politely indulged. To claim that "this is not the time" ignores the reality that America has found itself incapable of finding any appropriate time to have this urgent conversation. The victims in Colorado deserve at least that. And these tragedies take place everyday, albeit on a smaller scale.

America's president, Barack Obama, understands this. The number of homicide victims in his home town of Chicago this year has outnumbered those of US troops serving in Kabul.

Speaking in Fort Myers, Florida on Friday morning, Obama was right to suspend the routine campaign rhetoric and play the statesman. Nobody wants to hear about Mitt Romney's tax records and stimulating the economy on a day like this. There will be other days for electioneering.

But he was wrong to insist on this:

"There are going to be other days for politics. This is a day for prayer and reflection."

For what are we to reflect on if not how this, and so many other similar calamities, came about. Those who insist that we should not "play politics" with the victim's grief conveniently ignore that politics is what caused that grief. Not party politics. But a blend of opportunism on the right that flagrantly mischaracterises the issue, and spinelessness on the left that refuses to address it.

Americans are no more prone to mental illness or violence than any other people in the world. What they do have is more guns: roughly, 90 for every 100 people. And regions and states with higher rates of gun ownership have significantly higher rates of homicide than states with lower rates of gun ownership.

The trite insistence that "guns don't kill people, people kill people" simply avoids the reality that people can kill people much more easily with guns than anything else that's accessible. Americans understand this. That's why a plurality supports greater gun control, and a majority thinks the sale of firearms should be more tightly regulated.

The trouble is that people feel powerless to do anything about it. The gun lobby has proved sufficiently potent in rallying opposition to virtually all gun control measures that Democrats have all but given up on arguing for it. In the meantime, the country is literally and metaphorically dying for it.

Gun control is possible. There are both a constituency for it and an argument for it. But it can't happen without a political coalition prepared to fight for it.

If America can elect a black president, it can do this.

* * *
(My brand of yiddishkeit - Ed) 
Campers race during Camp Kinderland's World Peace Olympics 
Campers race during Kinderland's World Peace Olympics
 Thank You, Daily Caller, for Red-Baiting Camp Kinderland

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG -
Version: 2012.0.2196 / Virus Database: 2437/5144 - Release Date: 07/20/12

No comments:

Post a Comment