Monday, March 29, 2010

Avnery: On the road to Canossa

From: Rick Chertoff,

A history lesson from Uri Avnery.

On The Road To Canossa

IN JANUARY 1077, King Henry IV walked to Canossa. He crossed the
snow-covered Alps barefoot, wearing a penitent monk's hair shirt, and
reached the North-Italian fortress in which the Vicar of God had found

Pope Gregory VII had excommunicated him after a conflict over the right to
invest bishops throughout the German Reich. The excommunication endangered
the position of the king, and he decided to do everything possible to get it

The king waited for three days outside the gates of Canossa, fasting and
wearing the hair shirt, until the pope agreed to open the gate. After the
king knelt before the pope, the ban was lifted and the conflict came to an
end - at least for the time being.

THIS WEEK, the Netanyahu went to Canossa in the United States, in order to
prevent Pope Obama I from putting a ban on him.

Contrary to the German king, Bibi I did not walk barefoot in the snow, did
not exchange his expensive suit for a hair shirt and did not forgo his
sumptuous meals. But he, too, was compelled to wait for several days at the
gates of the White House, before the pope deigned to receive him.

The German king knew that he had to pay the full price for the pardon. He
knelt. The Israeli king thought that he could get off cheap. As is his wont,
he tried all kinds of subterfuges. He did not kneel, but barely bowed. The
pope was not satisfied.

This time, the walk to Canossa did not succeed. On the contrary, it made the
situation worse. The deadly sword of American excommunication continues to
hang above Netanyahu's head.
IN ISRAEL, Binyamin Netanyahu is considered the expert No. 1 on the USA. He
was brought there as a child, attended high school and university there and
speaks fluent - even if rather shallow - American.

But this time he was mistaken, and in a big way.

Netanyahu's heart is with the American right. His closest friends there are
neoconservatives, right-wing Republicans and evangelist preachers. It seems
that these had assured him that Obama would lose the big battle for health
care and would soon be a lame duck until inevitably losing the next
presidential elections.
It was a gamble, and Netanyahu lost.

At the beginning of the crisis over construction in East Jerusalem,
Netanyahu was still sure of himself. Obama's people rebuked him, but not too
severely. I seemed that the conflict would end like all the previous ones:
Jerusalem would pay lip service, Washington would pretend that the spit was

A less arrogant person would have told himself: let's not rush things. Let's
wait at home until it becomes clear who will win the health insurance
battle. Then we shall think again and make a decision.
But Netanyahu knew that he was assured an enthusiastic welcome at the AIPAC
conference, and AIPAC, after all, rules Washington. Without thinking much he
flew there, made a speech and harvested thunderous applause. Drunk with
success he waited for the meeting in the White House, where Obama was
supposed to embrace him before the cameras.

But in the meantime, something absolutely awful had happened: the health law
was adopted by Congress. Obama won a victory that has been called
Netanyahu was not facing a beaten and beleaguered pope, but a Prince of the
Church in all his splendor.

ACCORDING TO an Israeli joke, the shortest unit in time is the moment
between the light turning green and the driver behind you starting to honk.
My late friend, General Matti Peled, insisted that there was a shorter
moment: the time it takes for a newly promoted officer to get used to his
new rank. But it appears that there is an even shorter period of time.

George Mitchell, the hopping mediator, handed Netanyahu Obama's invitation
to the White House. The cameras showed everything: Smiling from ear to ear,
Mitchell extended his hand for the handshake, he even stretched out his
other hand to hold Netanyahu's arm. And then, the moment he thought that the
cameras had stopped recording, the smile disappeared from his face at a
dizzying speed, as if a mask had fallen, and a sour and angry expression

If Netanyahu had perceived that moment, he would have been cautious from
there on. But caution is not one of his most outstanding qualities.
Completely ignoring Obama, he told the thousands of cheering AIPAC-sters
that he would go on building in East Jerusalem, that there is no difference
between Jerusalem and Tel Aviv, and that all successive Israeli governments
have built there.

That is quite true. The most energetic settler in East Jerusalem was Teddy
Kollek, the Labor Party's mayor of West Jerusalem at the time of the
annexation. But Teddy was a genius. He succeeded in fooling the whole world,
appearing as a shining peace activist, gathering all possible peace prizes
(except the Nobel Price), and between prizes established a huge area of
Israeli settlement all over East Jerusalem. (Once I talked in Jerusalem with
Lord Caradon, the father of UN Security Council resolution 242, a sober
British statesman who was very critical of Israel. After our conversation,
he met with Teddy, who devoted the whole day to him and toured Jerusalem in
his company. By the evening, the noble lord had become Teddy's devoted
admirer.) Teddy's slogan was: Build and don't talk! Build and don't make

But Netanyahu can't keep quiet. It is said of Sabras, the native-born
Israelis, that they "finish quickly" because they have to run and tell the
boys. Netanyahu is a Sabra.

Perhaps Obama would have been ready to apply to Jerusalem the rule used by
the US armed forces about gays: Don't ask, Don't tell. But for Netanyahu,
the telling is the most important part of it, the more so since all the
preceding governments had indeed built there.

NETANYAHU'S OTHER argument is also interesting. He said that there is a
consensus about the new Jewish neighborhoods in East Jerusalem. Bill
peace plan provided that "what is Jewish in Jerusalem will go to Israel,
what is Arab will go to Palestine". Since everybody agrees that in the final
agreement the Jewish neighborhoods would be joined to Israel anyhow, why not
build there now?

This sheds light on a tried and tested Zionist method. When an unofficial
consensus about the division of the land between Israel and Palestine is
reached, the Israeli government says: OK, now that there is agreement about
the land we are getting, let's talk about the rest of the land. Mine is
mine, now let's negotiate about what is yours. The existing Jewish
neighborhoods are ours already. There we are free to build without
limitation. It remains only to decide upon the Arab neighborhoods, where we
also intend to build.

Actually, Netanyahu should be thanked. For decades, everybody made a
distinction between the "settlements" in the West Bank and Gaza and the
"Jewish neighborhoods" in East Jerusalem. Now this distinction has been
eradicated, and everybody speaks about the settlements in East Jerusalem.

SO NETANYAHU went to Canossa. He entered the gate of the White House. Obama
listened to his proposals and told him that they were not sufficient.
Netanyahu huddled with his advisors in a side room in the building and went
back to Obama. Again Obama told him that his proposals were insufficient.
That's how it ended: no agreement, no joint statement, no photos.

That is not just a "crisis" anymore. It is something really momentous: a
basic change in the policy of the US. The American ship in the Middle East
is making a large turn, and this is taking a long time. There have been many
disappointments for peace-lovers on the way. But now it is happening at

The President of the United States wants to end the conflict, which is
threatening the vital national interests of the US. He wants a peace
agreement. Not at the end of time, not in the next generation, but now,
within two years.

The change finds its expression in East Jerusalem, because there can be no
peace without East Jerusalem becoming the capital of Palestine. The Israeli
building activity there is designed to prevent just this. Therefore, it is
the test.

Up to now, Netanyahu has played a double game. At one moment he leans
towards the US, the next he leans towards the settlers. Aluf Ben, the senior
political editor of Haaretz, this week asked him to choose "between Benny
Begin and Uri Avnery" - meaning, between Greater Israel and the two-state

I feel flattered by the formula, but the political choice is now between
Lieberman-Yishai and Tzipi Livni.
Netanyahu has no chance of escaping Obama's excommunication as long as he is
a hostage of the present government coalition. It is said that a clever
person knows how to get out of a trap into which a wise person would not
have fallen in the first place. If Netanyahu had been wise, he would not
have set up this coalition.

Now we shall see if he is clever.

Kadima is far from being a peace party. Its countenance is blurred. During
the whole year in opposition it has not proven itself in any way and has not
taken part in any principled struggle. But the public considers it a
moderate party, unlike Netanyahu's overtly extremist partners. According to
the latest polls, Kadima has recently extended its slight advantage over

In order to enter into serious negotiations with the Palestinians, as
demanded by Obama, Netanyahu will have to dismantle the existing coalition
and invite Livni in. Until that happens, he will be left standing at the
gate of Canossa.

The struggle between the king and the pope did not end with the humiliating
scene at Canossa. It went on for a long time. The battle between Netanyahu
and Obama will be decided much more quickly.

No comments:

Post a Comment