Monday, September 26, 2011

Wall Street Stays Occupied, Thousands Cheer Bernie Sanders'

 
Despite NYPD Efforts, Wall Street Stays Occupied
 
"Some reporters come to Liberty Plaza looking for Adbusters staff, or US Day of Rage members, or conspiratorial Obama supporters, or hackers from Anonymous. They're briefly disappointed to find none of the above. Instead, it's a bunch of people - from round-the-clock revolutionaries, to curious tourists, to retirees, to zealous students - spending most of their time in long meetings about supplying food, conducting marches, dividing up the plaza's limited space and what exactly they're there to do and why. And that's the point. More than demanding any particular policy proposal, the occupation is reminding Wall Street what real democracy looks like: a discussion among people, not a contest of money."
 
In These Times: September 25, 2011

The occupation of Zuccotti Park (a.k.a. Liberty Plaza Park) in Lower Manhattan, New York City, continues today, after a Saturday marked by a crackdown from the New York Police Department.

It is estimated that around 80 people were arrested during a breakaway protest march, and after handing out an "eviction notice" the NYPD surrounded the park that has been used as a campground and staging area.

The "Occupy Wall Street" protest began on Saturday, September 17, and was originally prompted by a call from Adbusters, as described by Patrick Glennon here, for people to "flood into lower Manhattan, set up tents, kitchens, peaceful barricades and occupy Wall Street for a few months."

The nature of yesterday's police action has led to widespread condemnation of alleged police brutality, and it's hard not to remove the word "allleged" upon viewing the photos and video footage that has emerged - which has been enough to make the not-always-political Gawker take note and use the headline "Cops Tackle, Mace Wall St. Protesters for No Obvious Reason."

James Fallows at The Atlantic has posted the slowed down and annotated version of one particularly disturbing video. His description is chilling:

He walks up; unprovoked he shoots Mace or pepper spray straight into the eyes of women held inside a police enclosure; he turns and walks away quickly (as they scream, wail, and fall to the ground clawing at their eyes) in a way familiar from hitmen in crime movies; and he discreetly reholsters his spray can.

Those who attend protests that challenge corporate power and unrestrained capitalism in the U.S. and Europe may have become used by now to a police response that is both excessive and untargeted, whether one is an active participant, an observer or merely a passerby. (I myself was among those coralled by the Metropolitan Police in London's Oxford Circus on May Day 2001, and can attest first-hand to the fact that the 3,000 people kept there without access to food, water or toilets for seven hours included at least one pair of bemused and terrified tourists from continental Europe who had a plane to catch and who begged in vain to be let past the line of riot police shields.)

But from all accounts so far, it appears that yesterday the NYPD, presumably under the edict of Commissioner Ray Kelly and Mayor Bloomberg, took the policing of such protests to new and violent levels.

At Waging Nonviolence, Nathan Schneider points out that the media coverage of the police's actions focuses on a sensationalistic treatment of violence rather than what the protests are about:

In an article that recounts as many gory details as will fit, the Daily News devotes only two short paragraphs to what the protest is actually about and what protesters have been doing all this time: "attempting to draw attention to what they believe is a dysfunctional economic system that unfairly benefits corporations and the mega-rich." True, but too little. The real story for the Daily News, it seems, is not this unusual kind of protest, or the political situation which it opposes, but the chance to have the word "busted" on the cover next to the cleavage of a woman crying out in pain.

Schneider's piece is well-worth reading in full, as is his piece at Truthout from Friday, in which he provides a critique of media coverage and sets the record straight about what how Occupy Wall Street evolved.

Some reporters come to Liberty Plaza looking for Adbusters staff, or US Day of Rage members, or conspiratorial Obama supporters, or hackers from Anonymous. They're briefly disappointed to find none of the above. Instead, it's a bunch of people - from round-the-clock revolutionaries, to curious tourists, to retirees, to zealous students - spending most of their time in long meetings about supplying food, conducting marches, dividing up the plaza's limited space and what exactly they're there to do and why. And that's the point. More than demanding any particular policy proposal, the occupation is reminding Wall Street what real democracy looks like: a discussion among people, not a contest of money.

However, despite Schneider's critcisim of the internet's role in spreading misinformation, it remains the case that, as with past protest actions and just about any activity of real significance that the mainstream media ignores or distorts, some of the best ways to keep up to date on Occupy Wall Street are the #occupywallstreet and #occupywallst Twitter hashtags, and livestreaming video. See also Kevin Gosztola who has been live-blogging for FireDogLake from the protests, and the "official" Occupy Wall Street website.

***

 

Thousands Cheer Bernie Sanders' Appeal to Obama, Super Committee: Make the Rich Pay for Deficits

Declaring that "Social Security is the most successful government program in our nation's history," and decrying threats to Medicare and Medicaid that would punish Americans who did not cause the current economic crisis,  Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders brought thousands of progressives from across the Midwest to the feet Saturday, as they cheered his message to President Obama and the congressional "Super Committee":"We can deal with deficit reduction in a way that is fair and responsible."

"Instead of balancing the budget on the backs of working families, the elderly, the children, the sick and the most vulnerable," Sanders said, "it is time to ask the wealthiest people and most profitable corporations in this country to pay their fair share."

In several speeches to crowds numbers in the thousands who gathered for Fighting BobFest events in Madison, Wisconsin, Sanders continues to spell out the progressive economic agenda that argues against cuts in Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid to balance budgets and address deficits and for tax policies that end special breaks for the wealthy and multinational corporations that offshore jobs from the United States.

President Obama is expected to deliver a major speech Monday on deficit reduction and the White House has indicated that the president's plan will not include "changes to Social Security." Sanders is glad of that: "I am delighted that the White House has decided not to cut benefits under the program that has kept millions of retirees out of poverty," the senators said in Madison. "Social Security has $2.5 trillion surplus, can pay out every benefit for the next 27 years and has not contributed one nickel to the deficit. Social Security should be strengthened, not cut."

That does not mean the House-Senate "Super Committee" on deficit reduction -- which is ramping up its work as members of Congress return to Washington -- will do so, however. Nor does it mean that related and equally vital programs, such as Medicaid and Medicare, are off the chopping block.

"Rumors persist that President Obama may embrace the idea of raising the age of Medicare eligibility, an idea he put on the table in his negotiations with Republicans during the debt ceiling debacle." notes the Campaign for America's Future, which has been closely monitoring threats to Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid.

"The report that Social Security is not going to be on the chopping block is welcome news – especially since Social Security contributes nothing to America's deficits," says CAF director Roger Hickey. "However, if the President again proposes raising the age of Medicare eligibility on Monday, he would be making a huge mistake, and such a policy would harm America's most vulnerable citizens. Medicare is a target for deficit cutters because many of them never liked the program; however they claim they want to change the eligibility age because health care costs are skyrocketing. The solution is instituting policies that control overall health costs: hit the pharmaceutical companies and insurance companies, not low income and sick Americans. We can't afford to let profiteers from the pharmaceutical and insurance industries make millions off of taxpayers any longer. The President should propose letting Medicare use its buying power to negotiate discount prices with the drug companies."

Sanders has taken the lead in the fight against balancing budgets on the backs of working Americans,

He's pushing a number of plans designed to strengthen the safety net, while demanding that the richest Americans -- who have enjoyed massive increases in their income and wealth in recent years -- begin to pay their fair share.

Some of the loudest applause for Sanders -- when he joined Dr. Cornel West, Congresswoman Tammy Baldwin, radio host Thom Hartmann and others in addressing an arena filled with labor, farm and community activists for Saturday's main BobFest gathering -- came when he spelled out a plan to assure the long-term stability of Social Security.

Arguing that the most effective way to strengthen Social Security for the next 75 years is to eliminate the cap on the payroll tax on income above $250,000, Sanders declared: "Lift the cap and cause the wealthiest Americans to pay their fair share."

Thousands of activists whose level of commitment will decide the fate of Democratic contenders in 2012 leapt to their feet and cheered.

If President Obama and other Democrats in Washington want to know how to leap the enthusiasm gap that will be needed to win battleground states such as Wisconsin, Iowa, Ohio and Pennsylvania next year, Bernie Sanders has provided the answer.

Asked at a packed Friday night gathering in Madison to explain how Obama and the Democrats can win next year, the senator answered: "Clearly, you are not going to win over the American people unless you are prepared to stand and fight."

Again, the applause was thunderous.

Let's just hope it was loud enough to be heard in Washington by the president and by the Democrats who have been assigned to the "Super Committee.

 
 

No comments:

Post a Comment